|
|
Location of project area |
|
Arki
is a remote block of Jharkhand state. It has very dense forest. It
is located in Khunti sub-division of Ranchi District in India (http://jharkhand.nic.in/about/districts.htm). Munda
tribe is in majority in this region.
Forest plays a vital role in shaping their culture, economic and
religions life. The region is rich in flora and fauna. Sal is the
main type of forest found here. Other trees found are gamhar,
mahua, palas, jackfruit, mango, tamarind, kendu and wide varieties
of medicinal plants.
Non Timber
Foresst Produce (NTFP) like laquer (locally called lac), Ber
( plum),Mahua (flower and seed), Kendu leaf, tamarind chiraunji
are few of the widely available produce of this region. |
|
 |
|
|
Background |
|
Munda community has a very distinct way of life. This makes them
very different from other community. Munda tribe in Arki region
has been living in the forest since ages. This was to preserve
their independence and identity. Right from the beginning Munda
were united to protect their natural and livelihood resources from
outsiders. They had their own traditional system of socio-cultural
and political governance- the Parha and the Manki Munda system.
They developed Khuntkatti system. They kept themselves away from
the center of power. They resisted the tax imposed by the emperors
and kings. This resistance became more prominent during the
British rule in India .It resulted in the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act
(CNT Act 1908). |
|
 |
|
|
Problems
in the focus |
|
Tribal in Arki have been alienated from their very livelihood
resources –land forest and water. Their struggle today is no more
a sociological issue. It has become a political question. The
problem has also increased because most of the village heads,
called Munda, are not literate. They are least aware about the
various government programmes and schemes. In most of the tribal
villages, the non-tribal traders and moneylenders are powerful
enough to sway decision and schemes in their favour. Gram Sabhas
are weak. They are ignorant about the rights. It has affected the
poor tribal in a wider context: Forest and green cover has reduced
at rapid pace in the last 10 years. The collection of forest
produce has decreased. The rural’s food and livelihood security
has been greatly affected. Medicinal herbs, which were easily
available in the past in forest, are becoming extinct.
Anti tribal sentiments is prevalent among bureaucrats and
businessmen alike. Time and
again the peoples’ movement reminds the state of this reality. |
|
 |
|
|
Alienating laws |
|
The various Acts provided the
British with a better way of collecting tax from tribal. At the
same time they very consciously tried to destroy the self–governance of tribal. In turn they tried to set up their own
bureaucracy in the region. This violated the self-respect and
autonomy of tribal. British formulated the forest policy in
India. The aim was ‘consumption’ rather than ‘conservation’. Even
after the independence, the Forest Acts never considered tribal as
an integral part of the forest.
See:
Various forest Acts to manage forest. |
|
|
 |
|
Why AID
Intervened |
|
AID was operating in education and health activities in Arki block
for seven years. For more details see
www.aidindia.org.uk.
During that period AID found that the Khuntkatti rights were not
properly followed. Munda Raj system had become weak. That was
leading to fast depletion of forest cover. Poverty level showed an
increasing trend. So it became necessary to strengthen tribal
panchayat. The aim was to give power to the people to control over
forest. Concern over depleting forest cover was also expressed by
tribal. But they lacked proper information about Khuntkatti
system. AID entered the scene to show them the way. |
|
 |
|
|
AID drew a
strategy |
|
Arki block offered a great challenge for development. In order to
make the existing Khuntkatti system strong, AID started to
strengthen the village Munda panchayat. There are seven panchayat
with 71 villages where the project is running at present. There
are three area coordinators to monitor and supervise the work. The
aim is to control and manage forest for economic security. The
objective is to empower Gram Sabhas.
One of the first tasks of AID was to build up the capacity of the Munda panchayat (or
Gram Sabha). Women Self Help
Groups (SHG) and men Youth
groups (YG) were formed |
|
 |
|
|
Initiatives taken by AID |
|
The main focus of this project is Munda tribe. Particular focus is
on revival of Khuntkatti system of tribal governance. Workshop on
Forest Promotion & CNT Act takes place at regular interval. The
aim is to teach about the various privileges and rights provided
to tribal. Most of them are totally ignorant about such rights.
Case Study:
Strengthening of Munda panchayat
Capacity building and strengthening
of Community Based Organizations (CBO) has helped in preserving
the community forest in many villages. The CBOs are Self Help
Group (SHG), Youth Group (YG) and Munda panchayat. A means of
local vigilance set up by GS to protect forest justifies to this
point. People are more conscious about forest protection than what
they used to practice earlier. GS used to discuss more on their
local village issues and cultural events. The matter of forest
protection was taken very lightly. But the sincere effort by AID
staff has inculcated in them, the importance of forest.
Case
Study:
Awakening To Achieve The Mission
The local government is inaccessible to the tribal villages. The
project drew a strategy to break this isolation and link up the
area with government schemes and programmes in order to ensure
self-rule of the tribes. Most of the Gram Sabhas are not aware
about such schemes. Therefore various schemes of the government
have been explained to the tribal villagers at regular period of
time.
Case Study:
Catalyzing the groups into action
The village panchayat have been
geared to serve as a forest protection committee in each village.
Training on agro-forestry nursery raising and plantation in
degraded farmland has begun.
Case Study:
Preparing
ground for greenery |
|
 |
|
|
From the news desk |
|
Green & Wild: After a decade of dilly-dallying on the Jharkhand
Social Forestry Project due to intense opposition from various
pressure groups, the World Bank has finally given a green signal
to the Rs.1147.77-crore programme. It is now re-christened
Jharkhand Participatory Forest Management Project. The World Bank
has asked the state government and NGOs to work together in this
direction.
India shelves law empowering tribals: The Scheduled Tribes
(Recognition of Land Rights) Bill 2005, which seeks to recognize
the rights of forest-dwelling scheduled tribes (FDSTs) over forest
produce, has been pulled off the agenda for discussion by the
Indian cabinet, following a heated debate between tribal rights
and social groups on the one hand and environmentalists on the
other, over provisions in the draft bill.
See
http://southasia.oneworld.net/article/view/110977/1/ |
|
 |
|
| |
|
Constitution of India |
|
The Constitution of
India prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion,
race, caste, sex or place of birth (Article 15). It
provides the right to equality (Article 14), to freedom
of religion (Articles 25-28) and to culture and
education (Articles 29-30). See more details about
Constitution of India in
http://indiacode.nic.in |
|
|
| |
| |
|

Munda Tribe |
| |
|
Khuntkatti Rights |
|
It is a unique system
of self-rule. Munda have been given power to manage
forest. The land and forest belongs to community as
whole. It is also referred as Munda Raj System. |
|
|
| |
| |
|
CNT Act
1908 |
|
Chotanagpur Tenancy
Act intends to protect the land of the tribals and their
restoration to them. Sections 7 and 8 of the Act
regulate the right of khunt-katti raiyats (a particular
kind of tenants of land). According to the customary
rights, the male descendants inherit the lands. The
purpose is for cultivation. Section 76 and
Section 6 gives effect to
custom, usage, or customary rights. They have been
safeguarded by the provisions of the Act. |
|
|
| |
| |
|
Panchayati Raj Act |
|
In 1992 a special
commission was appointed by the central government. It
recommended for self- rule and self-development of the
Adivasi people. After much protest the Act was passed in
parliament in 1996. It was called Panchayati Raj Act.
Under this Act special power was given to gram panchayat.
The Jharkhand government passed the bill in 2001.
See |
|
|
| |
|
At present there are 63 women SHGs and 57 Youth groups
formed in the project area. Strengthening of all
71-village panchayats are taking place with
well-coordinated team of field staff and technical team. |
|
|
| |
|
Jharkhand Panchayati Raj
Act |
|
The Jharkhand State
government passed Panchayati Raj Act in 2001.However it
violated the central Act of 1996.It has not given any
power to Gram Sabha (GS) to approve plans and projects
for development. Nor it has recognized the Kutkati
rights.
There is a lack of
clarity on the relation between the Gram Sabha and the
gram panchayat in terms of funds and powers. The
Jharkhand Act has been the subject of both political and
legal challenges. Elections have not been held under
this act to date. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Munda Gram Sabha |
|
 |
|
It is a meeting
of villagers to discuss about issues related to
village. It takes place at regular interval of time.
The head of the village called Munda leads GS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|